Building your data castle: Protecting from ransomware and restoring data after a breach

(c)iStock.com/Pobytov

The data centre is the castle. You can pull up the drawbridge, fill up the moat, or pull down the portcullis. But at some point, you have to let data in and out, and this opens up the opportunity for ransomware attacks.

No longer is it a matter of pride and peer recognition in the hacker community for circumnavigating and exposing the security of an organisation because it is now a fully-fledged industry in its own right with the use of ransomware.  That cybersecurity company Herjavec Group estimates to top a $1 Billon in 2016. In the past, those under siege used to flood the moats, pull up the drawbridges and drop the portcullis to protect themselves but with the modern data centre organisations life blood is the movement of data in and out of the data centre. 

The question now is not just how can organisations protect themselves from ransomware, but also what are the best practices and policies for recovery in case they get through.  Data has to flow in and out and that opens up the route in for security breaches and the most profitable one is ransomware. So can it be prevented from ever occurring, and how can that be achieved? After all, as always, prevention is better than cure and the first line of defence has to involve firewalls, email virus scanners and other such devices. The problem is that the writers of the code of computer viruses are always one step ahead of the data security companies that offer solutions to protect their customers. This is because the industry tends to be reactive to new threats rather than proactive.

With so many devices connecting to the corporate network, including bring your own devices (BYOD), there will always be an attack that gets through, especially as many end users are not totally savvy with how viruses and other such scams can be attached to emails while masquerading as normal everyday files. A certain amount of end user education will help but there will be the one that gets through.  So to protect ourselves, organisations have to have back-up plans on policies to deal with the situation when it does happen because we can’t keep the drawbridge up forever.

Is ransomware new?

So how long have ransomware attacks been around? Well excluding the viruses written by governments for subversion, we have always had viruses that hackers write for fun, notoriety, or to use as a robot in a denial of service attack. They may also use an email relay. With the coming of Bitcoin, where payments can be received anonymously and as you see from the Herjavec Group’s estimates it can be very lucrative while also being very costly to the organisations that are attacked. This is why companies should be creating their very own data castles, and they should only drop their drawbridges whenever it is absolutely safe or necessary to do so. Due diligence at all times is otherwise crucial.

One of the key weapons against ransomware is the creation of air gaps between data and any back-ups.  A solid back-up system is the Achilles heel of any ransomware and it has been proven many times over, such as in the case of Papworth Hospital. However, with the ever-increasing sophistication of ransomware and the use of online back-up devices, it won’t be long before it turns its attention to those devices as well. It’s therefore important to have back-up devices and media that have an air gap between themselves and the corporate storage network. This is going to be crucial in the future.  When you think about it, there is a lot of money at stake here on both sides if ransomware becomes back-up aware. So it’s important to think and plan ahead, and it’s perhaps a good idea to make back-ups appear less visible to any ransomware that might be programmed to attack them.

Disaster recovery

So what is the most effective way to recover from an attack? Any and every back-up strategy should be based around the recovery strategy for the organisation. Once the offending programs, and all its copies are removed.  Obviously, the key systems should be recovered first, but this will depend on the range and depth of the attack. One of the things that is easily overlooked in a recovery plan is the ability to reload the recovery software with standard operating system tools – it is something that is often overlooked in recovery scenario tests.

The key is to have a back-up plan. In the future that ransomware will, rather than blasting its way through the file systems, work silently in the background encrypting files over a period of time so that these files become a part of the back-up data sets. It is therefore important to maintain generations of data sets, not only locally but offsite in a secure location. Remember the old storage adage that your data is not secure until you have it in 3 places and in 3 copies.

I’d also recommend the following top 5 tips for protecting your organisation against ransomware:

  • Educate your end-users to make them more aware of the implications of ransomware and how it is distributed
  • Ensure that you deploy an up-to-date firewall and email scanners
  • Air gap your backups and archives from the corporate network
  • Maintain good generation controls for backups
  • Remember that backup is all about recovery; it’s better to prevent the need to recover by planning ahead for disasters such as a ransomware attack to maintain business continuity

These principles don’t change for enterprises that are based in the cloud. Whilst the cloud provides some resilience through the economies of scale that many could not afford in their own data centre, one should not assume that the data is any more secure in the cloud than in your own data centre.  Back-up policies for offsite back-ups and archive should still be implemented.

Inflight defence

But how can you prevent an attack while data is inflight? Whilst we have not seen this type of attack yet, it is always a strong recommendation that data inflight is encrypted preferably with your own keys before it hits your firewall. However, as many companies use WAN optimisation to improve their performance over WAN networks transporting encrypted files means little or no optimisation is possible. This can affect those all-important offsite DR, backup and archive transfers.  Products such as PORTrockIT can, however, enable organisations to protect their data while mitigating the effects of data and network latency. Solutions like this can enable you to build and maintain your data castle. 

Building your data castle: Protecting from ransomware and restoring data after a breach

(c)iStock.com/Pobytov

The data centre is the castle. You can pull up the drawbridge, fill up the moat, or pull down the portcullis. But at some point, you have to let data in and out, and this opens up the opportunity for ransomware attacks.

No longer is it a matter of pride and peer recognition in the hacker community for circumnavigating and exposing the security of an organisation because it is now a fully-fledged industry in its own right with the use of ransomware.  That cybersecurity company Herjavec Group estimates to top a $1 Billon in 2016. In the past, those under siege used to flood the moats, pull up the drawbridges and drop the portcullis to protect themselves but with the modern data centre organisations life blood is the movement of data in and out of the data centre. 

The question now is not just how can organisations protect themselves from ransomware, but also what are the best practices and policies for recovery in case they get through.  Data has to flow in and out and that opens up the route in for security breaches and the most profitable one is ransomware. So can it be prevented from ever occurring, and how can that be achieved? After all, as always, prevention is better than cure and the first line of defence has to involve firewalls, email virus scanners and other such devices. The problem is that the writers of the code of computer viruses are always one step ahead of the data security companies that offer solutions to protect their customers. This is because the industry tends to be reactive to new threats rather than proactive.

With so many devices connecting to the corporate network, including bring your own devices (BYOD), there will always be an attack that gets through, especially as many end users are not totally savvy with how viruses and other such scams can be attached to emails while masquerading as normal everyday files. A certain amount of end user education will help but there will be the one that gets through.  So to protect ourselves, organisations have to have back-up plans on policies to deal with the situation when it does happen because we can’t keep the drawbridge up forever.

Is ransomware new?

So how long have ransomware attacks been around? Well excluding the viruses written by governments for subversion, we have always had viruses that hackers write for fun, notoriety, or to use as a robot in a denial of service attack. They may also use an email relay. With the coming of Bitcoin, where payments can be received anonymously and as you see from the Herjavec Group’s estimates it can be very lucrative while also being very costly to the organisations that are attacked. This is why companies should be creating their very own data castles, and they should only drop their drawbridges whenever it is absolutely safe or necessary to do so. Due diligence at all times is otherwise crucial.

One of the key weapons against ransomware is the creation of air gaps between data and any back-ups.  A solid back-up system is the Achilles heel of any ransomware and it has been proven many times over, such as in the case of Papworth Hospital. However, with the ever-increasing sophistication of ransomware and the use of online back-up devices, it won’t be long before it turns its attention to those devices as well. It’s therefore important to have back-up devices and media that have an air gap between themselves and the corporate storage network. This is going to be crucial in the future.  When you think about it, there is a lot of money at stake here on both sides if ransomware becomes back-up aware. So it’s important to think and plan ahead, and it’s perhaps a good idea to make back-ups appear less visible to any ransomware that might be programmed to attack them.

Disaster recovery

So what is the most effective way to recover from an attack? Any and every back-up strategy should be based around the recovery strategy for the organisation. Once the offending programs, and all its copies are removed.  Obviously, the key systems should be recovered first, but this will depend on the range and depth of the attack. One of the things that is easily overlooked in a recovery plan is the ability to reload the recovery software with standard operating system tools – it is something that is often overlooked in recovery scenario tests.

The key is to have a back-up plan. In the future that ransomware will, rather than blasting its way through the file systems, work silently in the background encrypting files over a period of time so that these files become a part of the back-up data sets. It is therefore important to maintain generations of data sets, not only locally but offsite in a secure location. Remember the old storage adage that your data is not secure until you have it in 3 places and in 3 copies.

I’d also recommend the following top 5 tips for protecting your organisation against ransomware:

  • Educate your end-users to make them more aware of the implications of ransomware and how it is distributed
  • Ensure that you deploy an up-to-date firewall and email scanners
  • Air gap your backups and archives from the corporate network
  • Maintain good generation controls for backups
  • Remember that backup is all about recovery; it’s better to prevent the need to recover by planning ahead for disasters such as a ransomware attack to maintain business continuity

These principles don’t change for enterprises that are based in the cloud. Whilst the cloud provides some resilience through the economies of scale that many could not afford in their own data centre, one should not assume that the data is any more secure in the cloud than in your own data centre.  Back-up policies for offsite back-ups and archive should still be implemented.

Inflight defence

But how can you prevent an attack while data is inflight? Whilst we have not seen this type of attack yet, it is always a strong recommendation that data inflight is encrypted preferably with your own keys before it hits your firewall. However, as many companies use WAN optimisation to improve their performance over WAN networks transporting encrypted files means little or no optimisation is possible. This can affect those all-important offsite DR, backup and archive transfers.  Products such as PORTrockIT can, however, enable organisations to protect their data while mitigating the effects of data and network latency. Solutions like this can enable you to build and maintain your data castle. 

Three #DevOps Predictions | @DevOpsSummit @CAinc @Aruna13 #DevSecOps

A lot of time, resources and energy has been invested over the past few years on de-siloing development and operations. And with good reason. DevOps is enabling organizations to more aggressively increase their digital agility, while at the same time reducing digital costs and risks. But as 2017 approaches, the hottest trends in DevOps aren’t specifically about dev or ops. They’re about testing, security, and metrics.

read more

21 #DevOps and #Docker Reference Architectures | @DevOpsSummit #SDN

When building DevOps or continuous delivery practices you can learn a great deal from others. What choices did they make, what practices did they put in place, and how did they connect the dots? At Sonatype, we pulled together a set of 21 reference architectures for folks building continuous delivery and DevOps practices using Docker. Why? After 3,000 DevOps professionals attended our webinar on «Continuous Integration using Docker» discussing just one reference architecture example, we recognized there was a strong interest in the community to learn more. That’s why we assembled 20 more reference architectures into this collection.

read more

Happiness of #DevOps Transformation | @DevOpsSummit #APM #ML #SDN

«It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.» – W. Edwards Deming. How often do we see this quote used in DevOps blogs without a hint of irony? It’s as if we need to instantly complete generations of evolution to stave off extinction, like trying to grow an extra lung overnight. DevOps or Die!!! So this is it – the dreaded DevOps transformation looms large. The department will be ‘shaken up’, practices will be ‘turned on their head’, and staff will be ‘taken out of their comfort zone’. It’s sink or swim: The extinct will be carried out on stretchers, to graveyards in which Ops and Dev are siloed for eternity.

read more

The Wireless Market in 2017 (Part 2)

In the second video of a three-part series, Network & Security Solutions Architect, Dan Allen, discusses wireless solutions and topologies, trends in the market and what to think about when starting your wireless project. Stay tuned for Part 3 later this week. To view part 1 of the series, click here.

If you would like to discuss how to make your next wireless project a success, reach out to us.

Download this free White Paper and get 6 quick tips to avoid common mistakes and to help ensure your wireless infrastructure can support the demanding needs of the business.

By Dan Allen, Network & Security Solutions Architect

The In-House IT and MSP Dynamic | @CloudExpo #Cloud #DataCenter

In-house IT professionals and managed service providers (MSPs) have had an interesting relationship over the course of IT history. Yes, they are vastly different, but if we drew a Venn diagram of IT and the MSP, the intersection of the two is worth exploring, particularly regarding how IT professionals can best manage their MSPs and work harmoniously to advance the common goal of IT performance.
For IT professionals, the very utterance of the acronym “MSP” may conjure feelings of skepticism and fearing the reaper, which doesn’t need to be the case. MSPs don’t always equal outsourcing IT in its entirety. Let’s explore common scenarios where in-house IT professionals and MSPs work together, because in these cases, in-house IT professionals need to understand how to get the most out of these relationships and up-level their careers by properly managing MSPs. It’s a lot more involved than simply passing help desk tickets back and forth.

read more

How to redeem Acronis backup offer with Parallels Desktop 12

Parallels Support team guest author: Gunasekaran Udayakumar   In today’s Internet age, the technology industry is constantly evolving. Do you remember how important local storage used to be? It’s now faded away, giving way to cloud services. Every day we are online, posting on social media channels, attending courses, and using a wide range of online […]

The post How to redeem Acronis backup offer with Parallels Desktop 12 appeared first on Parallels Blog.

App container market to hit $2.7bn by 2020 – with consolidation signs already afoot

(c)iStock.com/bugphai

The application container market is expected to grow to $2.7 billion by 2020 up from $762m in 2016, according to the latest note from 451 Research.

The analysts put app containers in the overall bucket of cloud-enabling technologies (CET) alongside virtualisation, automation, and private platform as a service, and argues that while by no means the largest segment, containers will see the quickest growth. The overall market will see a 15% CAGR over the next four years, and be worth $39.6bn by the end of 2020.

According to 451 Research, there are 125 application container vendors in the market – well, 125 that are worth tracking, at any rate – and expects many new entries into the market on a quarterly basis. The firm says it is ‘remarkable’ that vendors large and small are able to meaningfully leverage or offer app container technology and support.

The researchers also take the opportunity to compare app containers to OpenStack, which was valued at $1.8bn in 2016. With both markets being based on open source software and both experiencing rapid enterprise growth in a relatively short space of time, it makes sense to compare the two.

“Current estimates are conservative,” said Jay Lyman, principal analyst for cloud management and containers at 451 Research. “In the three years we’ve been tracking the OpenStack market, we’ve watched it grow from just 30 vendors in 2013 to more than 91 vendors today. We will be tracking the container market closely to see whether that translates into even higher revenue and faster growth than with OpenStack.

“Just as we saw with OpenStack, revenue generation in the early application container market is characterised by some pure-play vendors and larger established vendors generating significant revenue, but most players are just beginning to realise paid engagements,” added Lyman.

451 added it expects to see more movement for app containers beyond development and testing towards production use. The research firm cited Apprenda’s acquisition of Kismatic, a backer of Kubernetes, and Cisco acquiring ContainerX, a supporter of Docker Swarm, as signs of consolidation in the market.

Back in July, a study from NetEnrich found that 70% of 200 IT professionals surveyed were using containers within their environments, yet adding that integrating with existing IT ecosystems was the biggest challenge. Lack of experience in managing container technologies was also cited as an issue, with Docker, Kubernetes and Mesos being described as ‘moderately challenging’ to learn.

App container market to hit $2.7bn by 2020 – with consolidation signs already afoot

(c)iStock.com/bugphai

The application container market is expected to grow to $2.7 billion by 2020 up from $762m in 2016, according to the latest note from 451 Research.

The analysts put app containers in the overall bucket of cloud-enabling technologies (CET) alongside virtualisation, automation, and private platform as a service, and argues that while by no means the largest segment, containers will see the quickest growth. The overall market will see a 15% CAGR over the next four years, and be worth $39.6bn by the end of 2020.

According to 451 Research, there are 125 application container vendors in the market – well, 125 that are worth tracking, at any rate – and expects many new entries into the market on a quarterly basis. The firm says it is ‘remarkable’ that vendors large and small are able to meaningfully leverage or offer app container technology and support.

The researchers also take the opportunity to compare app containers to OpenStack, which was valued at $1.8bn in 2016. With both markets being based on open source software and both experiencing rapid enterprise growth in a relatively short space of time, it makes sense to compare the two.

“Current estimates are conservative,” said Jay Lyman, principal analyst for cloud management and containers at 451 Research. “In the three years we’ve been tracking the OpenStack market, we’ve watched it grow from just 30 vendors in 2013 to more than 91 vendors today. We will be tracking the container market closely to see whether that translates into even higher revenue and faster growth than with OpenStack.

“Just as we saw with OpenStack, revenue generation in the early application container market is characterised by some pure-play vendors and larger established vendors generating significant revenue, but most players are just beginning to realise paid engagements,” added Lyman.

451 added it expects to see more movement for app containers beyond development and testing towards production use. The research firm cited Apprenda’s acquisition of Kismatic, a backer of Kubernetes, and Cisco acquiring ContainerX, a supporter of Docker Swarm, as signs of consolidation in the market.

Back in July, a study from NetEnrich found that 70% of 200 IT professionals surveyed were using containers within their environments, yet adding that integrating with existing IT ecosystems was the biggest challenge. Lack of experience in managing container technologies was also cited as an issue, with Docker, Kubernetes and Mesos being described as ‘moderately challenging’ to learn.

The cloud news categorized.