We just came off of a review of a product that handles both containers and virtual machines in the same interface. Under the covers, implementation of containers defaults to LXC, though recently Docker support was added.
\nWhen reading online, or searching for information, increasingly we see \u201cContainer Management\u201d products listed as competitors to Docker, when in reality things like Rocket, LXC\/LXD, and Virtualization are Dockers competitors.
\nAfter doing some looking around, we have decided that this shift in how Docker is perceived in the market is due largely to the fact that it is easy to set up and begin using. Inevitably, if the Docker install is large enough, something like Docker Enterprise Edition, Kubernetes, Apache Mesos\/DCOS will be required to container management, but for the entry level, \u201ccontainer management\u201d has less stringent requirements.<\/p>\n